Criminal Punishment Essay

Given the different speeds at which people may develop both(prenominal) physically and mentally, any form of transp arent mature limit may be arbitrary and irrational. Children do not merit to be assailable to guilty penalisation in the same way as adults. Children admit not had experience of life, nor do they have the same mental and intellectual capacities as adults. Persons old aged 15 to 19 geezerhood are more in all likelihood to be processed by law for the commission of a execrable offense than are members of any other population group. In reference to the case with the 6 yr. gray-headed dead reckoning his classmate, I cerebrate he should have round sort of penalisation. The immature boy had a scuffle the mean solar day before and went home and because of his environment and reproduction he knew that a gun was insecure and can cause harm to another(prenominal) person. The three-year- senescent boy at some point had to think about his actions and jibed to take the weapon to school and later, shooting the young classmate which means the young 6 yr. old practiced on pulling the trigger. Sure, you have an innocence operator here and each state sets the age limit on what age to upkeep a child with a criminal act.Age and criminal responsibility is a really touchy topic for umpteen any children under the age of 7 and in the United States the criminal arbiter system can charge a young person with a criminal abhorrence at the age of 6 years of age. I know of two cases where half-dozen year old boys were convicted on criminal charges in the state of California. I believe that the 6 yr. old in the cross readings shouldve been court ordered to undergo skipper counseling or treatment. If a punishment was not something the state wanted to issue, I definitely would argue that the youth was exposed to a household where guns and drugs were prevalent and the youth himself in my opinion may have suffered from some sort of PTSD. The classm ate that was thrust has a family and that family needs justice. Justice would not be served if the six year old walks away free. Charging the 19 yr. old in the house with guns and drugs does not solve the crime that took place at the school. There is an age limit for holing a child accountable for criminal responsibility and in this case, the youth shouldve been charged. The youth shouldve undergone a session to determine if he was mentally aware and hence the state shouldve charged the young boy.